Pacifier or finger, what is worse for the baby?

This is a topic that many parents consider. Pacifier or finger, what is worse for the baby? It is clear that the best thing is that the child does not acquire the habit with either of them, and that the damages that the suction entails, whether the pacifier or the finger, are much greater than the b

This is a topic that many parents consider. Pacifier or finger, what is worse for the baby?

It is clear that the best thing is that the child does not acquire the habit with either of them, and that the damages that the suction entails, whether the pacifier or the finger, are much greater than the benefits.

Many parents are totally in favor of the use of the pacifier, since it gives a respite to the parents when it comes to calm their children and gain a little independence from the baby. But the truth is that, although it is a rápido quick and easy resource , it is not the most convenient for the baby.In the case of the finger, the thing is much more complicated, since the

habit of sucking the finger is stronger in the babies who already sucked their finger inside the womb. Pacifier or finger, what is worse for the baby?

We expose the

inconveniences of each one , although in most cases we are not the parents we choose, but the baby himself. If the child has been born sucking the finger it will be almost impossible that you can change the habit to the pacifier. On the other hand, inducing the use of a pacifier can be useful during the first months of life, but not after six months. So, pacifier or finger, what is worse for the baby?Pacifier Vs Finger

The main disadvantage of thumb sucking is the one that the child perceives as a great advantage: that

is always at hand. The baby may have unintentionally found his finger from the first formation inside the mother, so that some children at birth already have a

callus on the finger ; but others, who begin by sucking the pacifier, change the finger because they really have it more at hand and always find it.For us this is a disadvantage because

we can not control when the child decides to suck his finger or not, something we can do with the pacifier. Initially, babies feel the need to suck because in their lips and tongue they have more developed

sense of touch por, that is why babies explore through the mouth. During the first months of life the act of sucking is innate in them, and in the pacifier or the finger they find the pleasure of feeling close to the mother, of relieving hunger, finding calm and feeling safe. This effect, which during the first 3 months of life is so important, and even healthy, begins to be harmfulas the baby grows.

After 6 months, the use of the pacifier should be restricted little by little, something that we can not do with our finger. As for the habit of suction, it is usually greater in children who suck their finger than in those who use a pacifier, making it more difficult to eradicate.

The use of the finger is usually done more frequently in babies, because they are always close by, and this intensive use of the finger causes

deformities on the palate and teeth more usually than with the pacifier.

On the other hand, the pacifier, if it is not changed frequently, may have defects or detachments of the teat, or nibble the teat and break it into pieces, causing suffocation. Another drawback of the pacifier, is that obviously, is more expensive than the finger.

So, if we have to look for a clear

winner between Finger Vs Pacifier, we have it clear: Neither of us; but if you have to choose, we are left with the pacifier.